1. Practical Theory: Teaching and Shortcuts

• Chris Lehmann, inspired by Dan Meyer’s 8th episode of his dy/av series, asks that if “Herculean” effort is needed for teachers to be truly effective and great- are there things new teachers can do to help prevent burn-out and reduce the high attrition rate common among new teachers? The comments also contain some good ideas on how to keep good, hard working teachers in the profession. As a teacher that was hired one week before his first teaching job to teach brand new classes with no set curriculum, the humongous work load on new teachers strikes a chord with me, as does the problem of teachers who take too many “shortcuts.”
  • Penelope of Where’s the Teacher? adds to this thread as well as part of her critique of Hollywood teacher movies. Check it out.

2. The entire dy/av series

• Dan Meyer decided to create a summer series of short videos on planning, working, management, and more. The series is probably more effective than 95% of new teacher orientation programs (in my opinion). Each week I’ve looked forward to the next episode, and will miss it when it’s gone. Follow this link to the 10th and final episode, which includes links to the other 9.

3. Google Reader Preview Extension for Firefox

• In Will Richardson’s post on the new improved delicious, he quickly notes he’s been using this preview extension for Google Reader which allows you to view the actual webpage in the reader window by clicking on a preview button. Why is that cool? It’s cool because it means you can read and leave comments directly through Google Reader. No more having 25 tabs of articles whose comments you want to read and where you want to leave comments. I’ve been looking for something to allow this functionability through GR for awhile!! NOTE: You do need to install the Greasemonkey User Script Add-on to install the GR Preview Extension.

4. Science Teacher: A blog

• I’ve been keeping my eyes out for them for awhile, and have just now found my first good one. I’ve been interested in reading another science teacher who blogs primarily on the teaching of science (as opposed to just edu-tech stuff). Michael Doyle’s blog Science Teacher does just that. I’m hoping to do a little more science specific blogging, and I’m grateful for the model that I’ve found. Thanks to Clay for pointing him out.

5. World War Z

• Maybe this goes better on a summer reading list, but I thoroughly enjoyed reading Max Brooks’ zombie novel, World War Z. It’s written as a series of interviews with individuals from around the world recounting the days leading up to and during the “dark years,” or their wars with “Zack.” Besides being just a good read, it also has some very subtle (but existent) social commentary on consumerism and our service based economy. One of the more interesting parts was the description of job training courses occurring in the midst of the Zombie War. The teachers were all former illegal immigrants, because 80% of the legal population was in the service economy, and didn’t actually know how to do anything. Definitely a good read, even if you’re not into social commentaries.

Recently a teacher from within his department confronted him on it with the ominous: “We, the department, know you’re blogging.¹” The blog is anonymous to protect the innocent, though the confronting teacher noted he could recognize people mentioned in the blog.

I won’t go through his whole story here (if interested, please read more at his blog), but needless to say, it could end with his removal from the credential program.

In my recent job hunt, I was asked by some if I was worried potential employers would see my blog. I wasn’t. I’d like any place that hires me to know that I am an active participant in my own global learning community. I wanted to get hired by a district and school that is supportive of the use of technology for personal professional development. If a district has a serious problem with a teacher that blogs, then I’d have serious reservations with accepting a job at such an institution.

In an episode of David Warlick’s Connect Learning podcast, Chris Lehmann of the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia discusses what he looks for when he’s interviewing for teaching positions. Instead of trying to determine whether teachers will be toadies of the system who’ll turn their monthly lesson plans turned in on time, he specifically looks for teachers who are active learners in their own right², both in their personal and professional lives. What better way to actively participate in your own learning that utilize a blog to share and have conversations about ideas?

There are too many schools (and teachers) out there who seem afraid that someone will find out what we’re actually doing in the schools. I understand there are real and important issues in protecting student privacy, but I don’t feel the system should be afraid of the general public finding out there is a group of thoughtful, reflecting, constantly improving educators out there.

Recently I posted a portion of some student work. I didn’t mention who the student was or really any details about the student whatsoever. Yet, if that student saw it posted he/she would obviously know it’s their work. His/her parents and some of his/her friends would probably also recognize it. Was that “unprofessional?” Did it break an “unstated, implicit confidentiality” between teacher and student? I argue it didn’t. Or was I wrong?³

________________________________________________________________________

¹ Everytime I’ve read that I think of the movie Congo: “We. are. watching. you.” It’s probably an inappropriate association.

² Among many other things.

³ This may be the clearest instance of preaching to the choir. Evar. If you’re reading this blog (especially commenting on it), you’re probably not blog-o-phobic. Oh well. Your thoughts on the matter are still appreciated.

My classmates were just trying to be nice, which is understandable. It can be awkward and uncomfortable to deal with conflict. However, it’s that dissonance in opinion where real meaning is made; that hacking it out between differing opinions, that purposeful attempt to sway people with differing views while they try to sway you.

Recently, in response to a new “top edublogs” list posted on a well-read blog, Dan Meyer and Darren Draper have expressed differing opinions on (perceived) motivations for blogging, what constitutes quality in a blog, and even “proper” Twitter use. I’ve found this disagreement extremely interesting to follow. I subscribe to both their blogs and find them both to be excellent at starting good conversations through their posts. They both create dissonance and then ask for their audience to weigh in with their opinions. While Dan tends to stir the pot² and Darren tends to ask quite nicely, they’re both doing essentially the same thing.

It’s been enjoyable to see these two heavyweights (they’re 23 & 35 on the best edublogs list of all time, after all) discuss whose method is superior. While I don’t think they’re going to change each other’s mind, they’re laying some excellent framework for the edubloggers of the future. These types of public disagreements are important- perhaps necessary³- for hashing out what exactly it is to blog about educational matters. Think of it as a modern, blogging version of the Continental Congress.

Anyone care to disagree?